| MARGARET'S
                      STORY 
 My children were born in 1976
                      and 1979, so I had to discover for myself what you are
                      calling attachment parenting. That's as good a name as
                      any. It put them fortuitously between the decline of Dr
                      Spock and the rise of Robin Barker, so apart from a
                      booklet from the Baby Health Centre which I mostly
                      ignored, I was on my own. Literally, on an isolated farm
                      with no close neighbours, family many miles away, and a
                      husband with even less parenting experience than I had.
                      And to cap it off, we had no phone, just a dodgy radio
                      link to my brother-in-law 60 km away.
 When I first became pregnant I
                      was doing a university course that included anthropology
                      and animal behaviour. My anthropology study included a
                      look at the Kung tribe of Kalahari bushmen, and I was
                      impressed with their low incidence of aggression, their
                      laid-back lifestyle, and their peaceful, cheerful way of
                      interacting.
 My animal behaviour studies taught me that maternal
                      behaviour is innate in all mammals, and I couldn't see why
                      humans would be any different if we could ignore learned
                      behaviour. At every stage of parenting of my babies, I
                      thought, "What would a Kung woman do? What would she
                      have time for? Where would her baby be right now in
                      relation to the rest of the family?". (Not shut up in
                      a room on their own, that was for sure.)
 I reasoned that the longest
                      period of human development took place in a family/tribal
                      environment not much different from how the Kung live, and
                      so that is the environment that is "natural" to
                      a baby. I tried to listen to my impulses and ignore
                      learned expectations. I guess it's odd that I used an
                      intellectual path to reach an instinctive response. So my babies' upbringing included
                      extended feeding on demand (until the age of two in the
                      case of my son; my daughter lost interest sooner), being
                      carried in a sling first on my front, then when they were
                      older on my back, sleeping within arm's reach of our bed,
                      and general inclusion in whatever was going on. It worked
                      very well in fitting in with my work on the farm - I
                      simply picked them up, threw in a spare nappy, and took
                      them wherever I was going. If they got hungry, I sat down
                      against a tractor tyre or fencepost and fed them; if they
                      fell asleep, I settled them on a bunny rug on the ground
                      beside me with the dog nearby to keep snakes away.  It wasn't hard - in fact, it
                      would have been much harder for me to follow someone
                      else's rules. It was a joyful, playful, learning time that
                      laid a good foundation for our family. Of course there
                      were worries, especially about what to do if they were
                      sick, but that was a separate issue. I can't remember any
                      real dilemmas about how to react to their needs. When I
                      visited my mother when my first baby was a few months old,
                      my aunt commented with wonder that he never cried. My
                      mother replied, rather tartly I thought, "Of course
                      not, he doesn't have anything to complain about". |